Which clinical scenario best indicates a risk for HIT?

Study for the NCLEX Exam. Utilize flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question comes with hints and explanations. Prepare thoroughly for your exam!

Multiple Choice

Which clinical scenario best indicates a risk for HIT?

Explanation:
HIT risk arises when the patient is exposed to heparin, because antibodies develop against the PF4–heparin complex that activate platelets and can cause both thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. This is most classically seen with unfractionated heparin used to treat conditions like deep vein thrombosis. The other scenarios do not involve this specific immune reaction to heparin: warfarin therapy can cause issues like skin necrosis but not HIT; placental abruption is an obstetric emergency unrelated to HIT; systemic lupus erythematosus can involve immune-mediated processes but not the PF4–heparin antibody–driven HIT mechanism. Therefore, heparin therapy for a DVT best indicates a risk for HIT.

HIT risk arises when the patient is exposed to heparin, because antibodies develop against the PF4–heparin complex that activate platelets and can cause both thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. This is most classically seen with unfractionated heparin used to treat conditions like deep vein thrombosis. The other scenarios do not involve this specific immune reaction to heparin: warfarin therapy can cause issues like skin necrosis but not HIT; placental abruption is an obstetric emergency unrelated to HIT; systemic lupus erythematosus can involve immune-mediated processes but not the PF4–heparin antibody–driven HIT mechanism. Therefore, heparin therapy for a DVT best indicates a risk for HIT.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy